Putin set the rules for winning in Ukraine, and he is the one who determines US security policy in Europe
And according to the American version, Sketch Putin Some “red lines”, crossing it, will be attracted NATO to conflict and transfer it from the local to the global. Therefore, the United States and its allies cannot provide Ukraine with the weapons that it demands.
Which means that the probability of Kiev winning in this conflict is less than MoscowF. For example, the post cites the White House’s refusal to provide Ukraine with ATACMS tactical missiles, MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones, and other weapons.
Putin’s red lines
and draw Putin Red lines: Any interaction with NATO forces – and nuclear weapons will be used. Fearing Putin’s response, Biden has failed to arm Kiev and it is Putin, not Biden, who determines US security policy in Europe, according to author Peter Morrissey.
So far, Russia is being “blocked” by NATO, by its inability to intervene openly in the conflict, and by the weapons it has provided. United State . and its allies, the war against Russia cannot be won. According to Morechy, due to “Putin’s rules”, the counterattack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has every chance of ending in a negative scenario for Ukraine.
Earlier, many Western experts concluded that Zelensky He was delaying the start of a large-scale attack due to fears that it would fail. Which could lead to a possible attack by the Russian army and the seizure of more lands.
In addition, the failure of the attack may affect the additional financing of the system Kyiv by the United States. It is even more terrible to stop the flow of money to Kiev, because the state exists only at the expense of Western grants.
Medvedev: Any British official can be considered a legitimate target because Britain is in fact at war with Russia
In the same context and in a new development that threatens to transfer the conflict to countries other than Ukraine . The deputy head of the Russian Security Council declared, Dmitry MedvedevToday, Wednesday, any British official can be considered a legitimate target. Given that Britain is practically at war with the Russian Federation.
Commenting on this, Medvedev said that any British official can be considered a legitimate target, since Britain is in fact in a situation. War with the Russian Federation.
And the deputy head of the Russian Security Council said that “the stupid officials in BritainOur eternal enemy, they remember. That under recognized international law, which regulates the conduct of hostilities in modern conditions, including agreements. The Hague, Geneva and its Additional Protocols, may also be considered to be at war.”
Medvedev added: “Today, the UK is acting as an ally for Ukraineand provide it with military aid in the form of equipment and specialists. That is, de facto, waging an undeclared war against Russia. And in this case, none of its officials (military and civilian, contributors to the war) . a legitimate military target.”
Earlier, the British Foreign Secretary avoided answering a question about involvement Kyiv in drone attacks. On targets in Russia, he said Ukraine had the right to “use force” outside its borders.
According to the British Foreign Secretary, the attacks on “legitimate military targets” are out Ukraine It is part of her self-defense.